Montgomery County, Virginia
Home  |  Calendar  |  Government  |  Services  |  Search  |  Contact Us  
Planning
 

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
2001 MEETING RESULTS

Prices Fork (Grange)
29 March 2001

Mapping the Future: Comprehensive Planning in Montgomery County, Results from March, 2001 Meetings: Prices Fork District

Prices Fork, Merrimac, McCoy, Belview
29 March 2001
Number in Attendance: 10

Likes
Dislikes
Issues
Solutions

Comprehensive Plan 2001 Meeting Results
bullet Final Report (May 2001)
bullet Preliminary Report (April 2001)
bullet Mount Tabor District Results and Comments (22 March 2001)
bullet Prices Fork District Results and Comments (29 March 2001)
bullet Riner District Results and Comments (27 March 2001)
bullet Shawsville District Results and Comments (20 March 2001)
bullet Mailed In Surveys Results and Comments (March 2001)
bullet Public Meeting Results
bullet Forms, Publications and News
bullet Sign on to the MontVa.com E-mail Lists.

Likes

  1. Rural Nature--Opposite of Roanoke
  2. Volunteer Organizations
  3. Farmland
  4. In the Country
  5. Open Space (Toms Creek
  6. Accessibility to Outdoor Recreation
  7. People
  8. Volunteer Fire & Rescue Personnel
  9. Quiet (although diminishing)
  10. Natural Beauty
  11. Jobs, Prevalence and Diversity
  12. Recreational Opportunities
  13. Virginia Tech--Cultural, Social, and Sports Activities
  14. Small Town Atmosphere
  15. Proximity to National Forest (Hiking)
  16. Neighbors
  17. Location
  18. People
  19. Climate--Four Seasons
  20. Rural Atmosphere
  21. History--Oldest settlement this side of the Allegheny
  22. Open Space, Farming
  23. Clean (Air, Water) Feel, Natural Environment
  24. View sheds
  25. Degree and Range of Services
  26. Safe Environment.
  27. Hospital Centrally Located
  28. Good Doctors
  29. Excellent Public and Private Education System
  30. Topography--Mtns and Rivers
  31. Low Tax Rate
  32. Community Schools (schools still centered in small communities)

 

Dislikes

  1. Mall Area/Market Place/Spradlin Farms indicative of poor planning
  2. Traffic
  3. Poor coordination between jurisdictions
  4. Lack of Landscaping
  5. No Sense of Community
  6. Loss of Downtown due to Big Box Development
  7. Hard to Find things in Blacksburg (Loss of retail in downtown area)
  8. Increase in Traffic
  9. Too Much Growth too soon.
  10. Helter-Skelter Development
  11. 114/460
  12. Poor Regional Cooperation and communication
  13. Interjurisdictional turf issues w/ communities, county, and Virginia Tech
  14. Blacksburg trying to take Prices Fork
  15. Loss of Community identity
  16. Services not proportionate to taxes
  17. Lack of public utilities
  18. Sprawl, created by non-enforcement of zoning, spot zoning
  19. Driving distances...automobile dependence
  20. 460 Mall Sprawl and traffic congestion
  21. Reactive traffic planning rather than long-term proactive traffic planning
  22. Recreational opportunities for kids who live outside of the towns.

Issues

Traffic/Transportation

  1. 460 & 114 ...mid-county congestion
  2. Lack of Road Maintenance on county or VDOT’s part (ditches, regravelling,
  3. Congestion--lack of VDOT response
  4. Road Connectivity
  5. VDOT (State response)
  6. Road & Infrastructure--lack of control; lack of adequate response from VDOT
  7. Increased control over the growth of roads.

Solutions

Traffic/Transportation

  1. 3-A (although, as pointed out, 3A solves the traffic problem only for those traveling between Roanoke and Blacksburg; it does not solve the traffic/congestion problems on 114 due to increased growth or commuter traffic from Radford, Pulaski County, and other points west)
  2. Alternative Routes

Development

  1. Spot Development
  2. Lack of Developer Responsibility...failure to hold developers responsible for impact of development
  3. Increased Growth/ Rapid Growth
  4. Need to determine numbers/impact of current and future development

Development

  1. Controlled Growth; tie growth to the provision of infrastructure (roads, water and sewer, schools, parks)
  2. Build from the core (center of the county) out.
  3. Restrictions on Developers
  4. Impact Fees
  5. Requiring developers to adopt the cost of development and not pass the cost of development on to tax payers (Purchasers should take on more of the cost)

Emergency Services

  1. Lack of the provision of emergency services in the 114/460 area. Outside of acceptable response times.

Emergency Services

  1. Build a Fire/Rescue Station on 114 which wouldn’t be hampered by mall traffic.

Open Space/ Farmland Preservation

  1. Preservation of Open Space
  2. Support of Farmers in order to keep farmland.

Open Space/ Farmland Preservation

  1. Tax incentives to help farmers/small farmers remain in farming or preserve open land;
  2. Enforcement of new zoning ordinance
  3. Conservation Easements
  4. Establishment of a RR Association (similar to Rural Electrification)
  5. Providing subsidies for farmers who improve water quality
  6. Increased support of extension service
  7. Determine how farming/farmland fits into the bigger picture.

Affordable Housing

  1. Need more affordable housing that is not manufactured housing (mobile homes)
  2. Increased housing for young couples
  3. Increased student housing
  4. Providing a place for everyone (housing, not mfg)

Affordable Housing

  1. Governmental subsidies for affordable housing
  2. Expanding Habitat for Humanity.

Water & Sewer

  1. Water quality in rural areas, most notably the Tom’s Creek area.
  2. Cost of water and sewer in rural areas

Water & Sewer

  1. Examine alternatives to traditional approaches to waste water treatment.
  2. Extending water/sewer out of towns to rural areas...find ways of providing public services to outlying areas.

Diversity

  1. Need to find ways to encourage and promote diversity within the population; lack of diverse population in Montgomery County makes recruiting and retention at Tech more difficult.

Diversity

  1. County could promote diversity by broadening images presented to public.

Taxes

  1. State Tax Structure unfair to rural counties/ counties in SW Virginia.
 

Planning/Government

  1. Outreach between local government and citizens
  2. Increased communication.
  3. Interjurisdictional Cooperation
  4. Increased support of and participation in regional planning.
  5. Finding better ways to increase public involvement

Planning/Government

  1. Need to find more avenues for discussion and communication
  2. Scheduling of more “informal” community meetings
©Montgomery County Department of Planning
Last Updated: 8 September, 2002
Comments and suggestions should be sent to the Montgomery County Planning Department

 


The Official Site of Montgomery County Government.
Montgomery County is an equal opportunity employer and provider of services.